Quantcast
Channel: Latest Discussions - COMSOL Forums
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 6573

Periodic Port

$
0
0

Hi all,

I recently faced a very strange problem after a long time of using periodic ports. I would really appreciate if someone can help me.

I am simulating a metsurface. As usual, I defined two ports (1 on, 1 off) and looked into the S parameters. However when I compared the S parameter results with the field distribution they don't match at all! For example, in a wavelength range whrere S11 is around 1, the field distribution shows the main part of the field transmitted.

This time I replaced port 2 with a PML boundary condition and get a completely different S11. The new S11 also matches well with what I expected.

Now I wonder what is my mistake here.** Specifically**, my question is about the position of the periodic ports (how far they should be from the scatterer) and the Mode phase (I had usually set it to 0 and got good results, how exactly I should define it now?).

Thank you very much.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 6573

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>